<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How bad is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3K image quality under low light?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://panasoniclumixreview.com/238/how-bad-is-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-tz3k-image-quality-under-low-light/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://panasoniclumixreview.com/238/how-bad-is-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-tz3k-image-quality-under-low-light/</link>
	<description>Reviews about Panasonic Lumix Cameras and Accesories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:20:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morey000</title>
		<link>http://panasoniclumixreview.com/238/how-bad-is-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-tz3k-image-quality-under-low-light/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Morey000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 18:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panasoniclumixreview.com/238/how-bad-is-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-tz3k-image-quality-under-low-light/#comment-592</guid>
		<description>The ISO800 is no match for the Fuji&#039;s but the TZ3 is a much more fun camera overall.

But-  a picture is worth a thousand words.  Here are comparative 100% crops.  It won&#039;t look nearly this bad in a 4x6 print.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonictz3/page12.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ISO800 is no match for the Fuji&#8217;s but the TZ3 is a much more fun camera overall.</p>
<p>But-  a picture is worth a thousand words.  Here are comparative 100% crops.  It won&#8217;t look nearly this bad in a 4&#215;6 print.<br />
<a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonictz3/page12.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonictz3/page12.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenks1545</title>
		<link>http://panasoniclumixreview.com/238/how-bad-is-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-tz3k-image-quality-under-low-light/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>jenks1545</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 18:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panasoniclumixreview.com/238/how-bad-is-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-tz3k-image-quality-under-low-light/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>i have the panasonic lumix dmc-fx8 and i get pretty good pictures under low light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have the panasonic lumix dmc-fx8 and i get pretty good pictures under low light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomTom</title>
		<link>http://panasoniclumixreview.com/238/how-bad-is-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-tz3k-image-quality-under-low-light/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>TomTom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 18:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://panasoniclumixreview.com/238/how-bad-is-the-panasonic-lumix-dmc-tz3k-image-quality-under-low-light/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>my suggestion
go to yahoo shopping
digital cameras
digital camera GUIDE
be sure to check titles on the left side
the guide should answer your questions 
also, go to cnet.com for camera reviews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my suggestion<br />
go to yahoo shopping<br />
digital cameras<br />
digital camera GUIDE<br />
be sure to check titles on the left side<br />
the guide should answer your questions<br />
also, go to cnet.com for camera reviews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

